In Indian legal history, the State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar case is significant. The west bengal special courts act 1950, and its constitutionality were at issue in this case, which was determined by the Indian Supreme Court in 1951. The legislature of West Bengal passed this act to ensure that certain offenses, including as those involving the smuggling of products, tax evasion, and corruption, would be tried promptly.
The act was contested on the grounds that it infringed upon a number of fundamental rights protected by the Indian Constitution, such as the right to a fair trial and equality before the law. The ruling in this case by the Supreme Court has significant ramifications for the evolution of Indian constitutional law, especially in relation to the defense of fundamental rights.
state of west bengal vs anwar ali sarkar Case Facts
- The Act to assist the speedy trial of particular offences was the title of the West Bengal Special Courts Act (X of 1950).
- According to the preamble of the Act, its goal was “to enable the swift adjudication of specific offences.” This Act’s Section 3 gave the State Government the power to create Special Courts by publishing a notice in the official gazette.
- According to Section 5, a written general or special order from the State Government will designate which offenses, or categories of offenses, cases, or categories of cases, A Special Court is to hear.
- The Criminal Procedure Code’s conventional procedure for trying offenses was modified by the Act to create a unique trial process for Special Courts.
- The respondent contended that section 5 was unconstitutional and void, and they were found guilty by a Special Court based on a notification given by the Government under that section.
- This argument stemmed from the idea that it went against Article 14 of the Constitution, which states that no one shall be denied equality before the law or equal protection under the laws while they are on Indian territory.
state of west bengal vs anwar ali sarkar Issues
- Is the west bengal special courts act 1950, outside the bounds of the Indian Constitution?
- Whether the accused’s fundamental rights been infringed upon by the Act’s provisions?
- Did the Act’s provisions go against the idea of the separation of powers?
- Is it true that the Act’s provisions infringed upon the right to equality before the law?
- Did the Act’s provisions infringe upon the right to a fair trial?
- Whether the Act’s provisions infringed upon the right to counsel?
Contentions by the Parties
Petitioner:
- The Indian Constitution’s Article 14 guarantees equal protection under the law and equality before the law, both of which are violated by the west bengal special courts act 1950. Without providing any justification, the Act divides criminals into two groups: those prosecuted by special courts and those tried by regular courts.
- The basic right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by article 19(1)(a) of the constitution is violated by the Act. The Act directly violates the right to freedom of speech and expression by giving the government the authority to investigate, prosecute, and punish people based solely on their ideas, opinions, and beliefs.
- Under article 21 of the constitution, the Act infringes upon the basic right to a fair trial. The accused is deprived of their right to a fair trial by a qualified, unbiased, and independent court under the Act.
- The Constitution’s cherished idea of the division of powers is broken by the Act. The Act gives the administration the authority to establish special courts, which are under the control of the government.
- The Constitution’s cherished federalism idea is broken by the Act. The Act interferes with the state governments’ ability to impose justice within their borders.
Respondent:
- The reply contended that the Act contravened multiple clauses of the Indian Constitution, specifically Articles 14, 19, and 21.
- The primary argument put forth by the respondent was that the Act contravened Article 14 of the Constitution, which forbids discrimination based on sex, caste, religion, color, or place of birth and ensures equality before the law.
- Respondent contended that the Act subjected specific classes of people to trials before special tribunals exempt from the same procedural protections afforded to ordinary courts, so constituting discrimination against them.
- Additionally, the respondent claimed that the Act was against article 19(1)(g) of the constitution, which protects the freedom to engage in any kind of employment or to operate a business, trade, or profession.
- The respondent argued that by limiting attorneys’ capacity to represent clients in the special courts, the Act infringed upon their freedom to practice law.
- Lastly, the respondent claimed that article 21 of the constitution, which protects the right to life and personal liberty, was broken by the Act. Respondent argued that the Act violated people’s right to due process of law by forcing them to appear in special courts that were not subject to the same procedural protections as ordinary courts.
state of west bengal vs anwar ali sarkar Judgment
- The west bengal special courts act is null and void because it granted the State Government arbitrary, unchecked, and unguided power that could be used unfairly and discriminatorily.
- It also limited the equal protection of the law. These violations of the Constitution are the reason why the Act is unlawful.
The state of west bengal vs anwar ali sarkar (1952) case is a seminal ruling that has immediate implications for the public as it provides a thorough examination of the right to equality for all individuals and the preservation of natural justice principles. The Act was ruled unconstitutional because certain individuals who are accused of heinous crimes may be singled out and subject to the new procedures, which, while providing them with some small benefits, deprive them of their significant rights and liberties.
With the goal of giving students the best coaching available for law entrance exams including the CLAT, AILET, and various other numerous state judiciary exams, Jyoti Judiciary Coaching, India’s Finest educational Platform, was established. Come enrol now with Jyoti Judiciary!
For any latest news, legal topics, judiciary exams notifications, patterns, etc watch Jyoti Judiciary’s YouTube channel for legal videos for any updates at https://youtube.com/@jyotijudiciarycoaching4852?si=2cwubh9d2A9urwJf
