Judgement

IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS FOR JUDICIARY EXAMS: JYOTI JUDICIARY COACHING

The relevance of significant rulings in the fields of legal education and judicial ambitions for a career cannot be emphasized. These decisions from the courts serve as the fundamental basis that backs up the jurisprudential framework, providing direction to scholars, professionals, and future intellectuals alike. It is essential for candidates who are preparing for the judiciary exams to fully understand and evaluate these court decisions.

Of all the coaching programs assisting candidates to achieve judicial excellence, Jyoti Judiciary Coaching stands apart due to the fact it takes a methodical approach to understanding significant decisions made by courts.

About Judgments for Judiciary Exams: Jyoti Judiciary Coaching

• Writing judgments is a crucial component of the examination for judicial services. Students at Jyoti Judiciary Coaching, the best Law coaching in Jaipur are tested on judgment writing whether it’s a lower judicial services exam or a higher judicial services exam.
• Students at this Law coaching in Jaipur are extremely knowledgeable on all substantive and procedural laws, including the Sale of Goods Act, the Civil Procedure Code, and the Contract Act, in order to attempt judgment writing questions.
• Remember that writing judgments is similar to step-marked math problems. Following the correct format for a court’s judgments and trying each stage of the judgment will therefore greatly improve your chances of being selected for the examination as advised by Jyoti Judiciary, the best Law coaching in Jaipur.

Important Judgments for Judiciary Exams: Jyoti Judiciary Coaching

The Case of Champakam Dorairajan Vs State of Madras:

• Upheld the Madras High Court ruling that had declared the 1927 government illegal.
• The government had made reservations for college seats and government employment.
• As a result, the First Amendment to the Constitution was passed.

Shankari Prasad Vs Union of India Case:

• It is lawful to implement the First Amendment.
• For Article 13, a Constitutional Amendment is not “law.”
• Distinctions made between “Constitutional Amendment” and “Ordinary Law.”

Mohd Hanif Qureshi Vs State of Bihar Case:

• The laws of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and MP regarding cattle slaughter are not broken by Articles 19 and 25.
• The Islamic faith does not need cow sacrifices on Bakr-Eid.
• Nonetheless, the complete prohibition was ruled unlawful, and the killing of “useless cattle” was permitted.

Hamdard Dawakhana Vs Union of India Case:

• Ruled that the Drugs & Magical Remedies Act’s Sections 3 and 8 are constitutional.
• Article 19(1) does not include the freedom to print commercial advertisements (a).
• There is a direct connection between physical harm from self-medication and unethical advertising.

Golaknath Vs Union of India Case:

• Ordinary law and constitutional amendments are the same thing.
• Under section III, no Fundamental Right may be changed by Parliament.
• In 1971, the 24th Amendment resulted from this.

Kesavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala Case:

• The ‘Basic Structure’ cannot be changed by the parliament.
• Articles 368(3) and 13(4) were in effect.
• As a result, the 42nd Amendment was passed and Articles 368(4) and (5) were added.

1. P. Royappa Vs State of Tamilnadu Case:

• Expanded the definition of equality.
• Since equality is a dynamic idea, it cannot be reduced to conventional boundaries.
• Arbitrariness is inimical to equality.

Maneka Gandhi Vs Union of India Case:

• Overturned AK Gopalan’s case and declared that “Due Process of Law” is a part of “Procedure Established by Law.”
• Legislation should be reasonable, just, and fair.
• The Golden Triangle shall not be broken by a law that restricts someone’s personal freedom (Articles 14, 19 & 21).

Some other Important Judgments for Judiciary Exams: Jyoti Judiciary Coaching

• Indra Sawhney and Union of India (1992)
• Lily Thomas v Union of India (2000)
• Aruna Shanbaug Case (2011)
• Nirbhaya Case (2014)
• National Legal Services Authority and Union of India (2014)
• Repealing Section 377 (2018)

Writing a judgment: Tips by Jyoti judiciary online coaching

Considered the foundation of the Judicial Services Examination is judgment writing. Writing judgments is a distinct section that is just as important as other areas in any civil judge examination as discussed at Jyoti Judiciary, the best online coaching for Judiciary.

When you stand for the judiciary exams, you can adhere to the straightforward judgment writing advice by Jyoti Judiciary online judiciary coaching provided below.

• Getting a solid understanding of all substantive and procedural laws is the most crucial step as advised by Jyoti judiciary Coaching online.
• When answering the judgment writing question, it is advised by the experts at Jyoti judiciary online coaching carefully review all of the provided information and highlight the key details.
• Spend a minute preparing a rough judgment structure, making sure to include all pertinent facts from the question as discussed in Jyoti Judiciary online judiciary coaching
• To enhance your time management abilities and quickness, aim to attempt as many questions as students at Jyoti judiciary Coaching online can from the previous year’s Judiciary Exam questions.
• Steer clear of technical jargon. Alternatively, students at Jyoti Judiciary, the best online coaching for Judiciary can speak in plain, understandable words.
• Additionally, compose a paragraph of four to five lines that emphasizes the case’s start as stated in the question.

Important Judgments for Judiciary Exams FAQs

1. Which Online rjs coaching is best for RJS preparation?

The reputable Jaipur Online rjs coaching program “Jyoti Judiciary Coaching” aids students in getting ready for the RJS exam. A systematic approach to RJS test preparation is made possible by Jyoti Judiciary, the top offline and online RJS coaching program in Jaipur. Their curriculum has been carefully designed to cover all the subjects and courses required for passing the Rajasthan Judicial Service Examinations.

2. Which coaching is best for judiciary?

The most effective judiciary coaching in Jaipur is provided by Jyoti Judiciary Coaching. The objective is to create a comfortable learning environment for the students. It makes the difficult task seem easy, which increases the likelihood of achieving the desired outcome. The objective at Jyoti Judiciary is to give students the best possible education possible. The Institute pledges to use every resource at its disposal to provide you with the finest preparation for the Judicial Services entrance examinations.

3. Why is Judgement important as a legal material?

A judgment’s primary goal is to express the judge’s own opinion. It gives the parties involved an explanation of the decision. Providing grounds for an appeal court to take into consideration is the second goal, which is equally as significant as the first.

4. How to write judgement in judicial exam?

• Introduction
• Facts Admitted
• Framing of Charges/ Framing of Issues
• Appreciation of Evidence
• Marshalling of Evidence
• Findings/Decision

5. How do judges give judgement?

Depending on the situation, an oral or written judgment may be rendered. Oral judgments are usually issued at the end of a hearing and are commonly employed by courts that have a higher volume of cases or when a decision needs to be made fast.

6. How long can a judge reserved judgment?

The Supreme Court ruled that the case should be assigned to a different bench for a new hearing rather than the same bench if the verdict is not given within six months of being reserved.

7. What is the essential of judgement in CPC?

A court’s decision is referred to as a judgement, as stated in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 2(9). It includes details regarding the case, such as the facts, the arguments and evidence the court considered, and the questions posed by the parties.

8. What is the time limit for summons for judgement?

The judge must deliver or serve the plaintiff with a “notice of appearance” on the day of the appearance. Following the entry of the appearance, the plaintiff is required to serve the defendant with a summons for judgment (in the form stipulated), which must be returned within 10 days of the date of service.

With the goal of giving students the best coaching available for law entrance exams including the CLAT, AILET, and various other numerous state judiciary exams, Jyoti Judiciary Coaching, India’s Finest educational Platform, was established. Come enrol now with Jyoti Judiciary!

For any latest news, legal topics, judiciary exams notifications, patterns, etc watch Jyoti Judiciary’s YouTube channel for legal videos for any updates at https://youtube.com/@jyotijudiciarycoaching4852?si=2cwubh9d2A9urwJf