ram jawaya vs state of Punjab Case Facts
- Six people made the allegations in a writ suit filed under article 32 of the indian constitution. They assert that they are in the business of creating, producing, disseminating, and retailing textbooks for various subjects in Punjabi schools under the name “Uttar Chand Kapur & Sons.”
- According to rumors, the Punjabi government’s Education department has been issuing notifications on the printing, publishing, and selling of textbooks since the 1950s as part of its putative nationalization strategy.
- In the petition, it was disputed that selling these books imposed unjustifiable limitations that drove away other merchants.
- The petitioners contended that the government of Punjab had violated their right to trade, which is protected by article 19(1)(g) of the indian constitution, and that this had happened without appropriate legislation or an executive order.
- As a result, they requested a writ of mandamus ordering the government to remove the notifications that violated their rights.
ram jawaya vs state of Punjab Issues
- Whether the state’s establishment of a school book business constituted a breach of the fundamental right to practice any profession, and whether this official action was legal or deemed too restrictive?
- Whether an executive act could have accomplished the same goal or if the administration needed special legislation to do so?
Contentions by the Parties
Petitioner:
- The petitioners relied on legislative backing to support their position, saying that the legislature is the body with the legal authority to enact laws and that the president does not have the authority to establish a trade or economic venture. The administration had established a monopoly in the publishing and trading sectors, exceeding its authority as an executive entity.
- The petitioners contested the executive branch’s decision to deny the publishers their legal right to conduct business, arguing that article 31 of the indian constitution prohibits the government from doing so in the absence of a valid statute and just compensation.
- Additionally, the petitioners said that the executive’s actions were ultra-vires and that they violated their right to engage in any kind of commerce and business under article 19(1)(g) of the indian constitution without any justifiable limitations.
Respondent:
- The government argued in response that it was entirely within their rights and obligations to carry out those actions, and it was implied that they fell under the executive branch’s purview without any power overlaps because, in addition to upholding the law, the executive branch is also responsible for ensuring social welfare.
- The government further argued that the actions taken could not be considered ultra-vires of the Constitution and did not violate the petitioners’ fundamental rights because they were carried out after adhering to the procedure by outlining all the specific steps involved, particularly financial ones.
ram jawaya vs state of Punjab Judgment
- The Supreme Court ruled that the executive branch could handle the task of printing and publishing textbooks without the requirement for special legislation.
- According to article 19(1)(g) of the Indian constitution, the petitioners lacked a basic right, hence the issue of a government monopoly under Article 19(6) is moot. As so, the petition was dismissed by the court along with costs.
The ram jawaya vs state of Punjab decision made it clear that although the executive might act within the bounds of legislative authority, it must always abide by the limits established by the Constitution. This case made clear how crucial it is for parliamentary approval of executive acts, particularly when those measures affect people’s economic freedoms and fundamental rights. The case continues to have an impact on governance and legal debate, serving as a constant reminder of the need to strike a balance between the preservation of individual liberties and governmental authority.
The tenets set forth in ram jawaya vs state of Punjab offer a fundamental point of reference that guarantees the spirit of the Constitution will triumph in the quest of justice and democracy as new issues arise and the extent of executive power changes.
For any latest news, legal topics, judiciary exams notifications, patterns, etc watch Jyoti Judiciary’s YouTube channel for legal videos for any updates at https://youtube.com/@jyotijudiciarycoaching4852?si=2cwubh9d2A9urwJf