If there isn’t a good cause to think that there was a conspiracy between them, a court cannot use anything done or written by one putative conspirator in evidence against him or against all of them. These phrases signify that everything spoken, done, or written by one accused party can only be used against the other if there is prima facie evidence of a conspiracy between the two accused parties. Rarely does a conspiracy have direct proof. It must be deduced from the environment.
The actions and statements of a specific person in relation to the common intention are relevant facts once there is a reasonable basis to believe that several people have conspired to commit an offence, even though that person may not have known of many others involved in the conspiracy or were complete strangers to him. Additionally, if evidence is gathered after prima facie evidence of a conspiracy, but at a later point in the trial, that reasonable basis for belief or prima facie evidence is refuted by new evidence, the court must disregard the earlier evidence. If you want to be a judicial officer and are looking for Judiciary coaching in Jaipur, here, at Jyoti Judiciary we provide comprehensive study material to make your preparation solidified and topnotch. From preliminary mock tests, to mains answer writing sessions every material required for clearing the exam is provided. We have separate legal current affairs classes, legal general knowledge, current affairs classes all in one time enrolment. Hurry up.
