The consideration or share prices in M.S. Madhusoodhanan v. Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2004 SC 909, were left to be decided later. A contract of this nature would allegedly be null and void due to uncertainty. The Sale of Goods Act, 1930’s Section 9 permits the parties to defer determining the amount of consideration and not to establish the price at the moment of the transfer, hence the Supreme Court rejected the claim by ruling that it was inadmissible. A contract that calls for the future fixation of prices by the parties themselves or by a third party can be rendered certain and is not ineffective.
If you want to be a judicial officer and are looking for RJS coaching, here, at Jyoti Judiciary we provide comprehensive study material to make your preparation solidified and topnotch. From preliminary mock tests, to mains answer writing sessions every material required for clearing the exam is provided. We have separate legal current affairs classes, legal general knowledge, current affairs classes all in one time enrolment. Hurry up.
